Deindustrialization: Its Causes and Implications
International Monetary Fund, 1997 - Business & Economics - 11 pages
Over the past 25 years, the share of employment accouted for bymanufacturing has fallen dramatically in the world's most advanced economies, a phenomenon widely referred to as deindustrialization.Many see deindustrialization as widening income inequalities and causinga sharp rise in unemployment. This paper argues that, contrary to popularperception, deindustrialization should not be regarded as alarming, butrather as a natural consequence of continued economic growth within the advanced economies.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
25 percent added in GDP advanced economies agricultural sector appropriate wage differentials Causes and Implications centralized wage bargaining countries decline deindustrialization continues deindustrialize faster developing world domestic expenditure East Asia Economic Issues Series employment from agriculture employment in manufacturing European Union expenditure on manufactured explained grow faster growth in services growth of North-South growth of productivity Hong Kong IMF Working Paper important implications International Monetary Fund Japan labor-intensive living standards manufacturing employment manufacturing sector manufacturing to services North-South trade output in manufacturing overall pattern of trade percent in 1994 production is technologically productiv productivity growth productivity in manufacturing productivity in services Province of China Ramana Ramaswamy reﬂect Regression analysis rise Robert Rowthorn role in deindustrialization service sector services employment share of employment share of manufac share of manufacturing shift in domestic Singapore Taiwan Province technologically progressive Tiger economies trade balance trade specialization turing ufacturing United value added wage-bargaining workforce