 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - Law reports, digests, etc - 1968 - 922 pages
...specification serves a purpose different from the claims ; it does not necessarily measure the invention. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405 at 419 (1908) ; Kuhne Identification Systems v. United States, 82 Ct. Cl. 237 at 258 (1936). It must... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1908 - 802 pages
...Consolidated Rendering Co. v. State of Vermont (207 U: S. 541) 178 Conde, Gperra v. (210 US 438) 763 Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. (210 US 405) 748 Contractors' Supply & Equipment Co. v. T. E. Hill Co. (207 US 589) 256 Cook v. Foley (209 US 543)... | |
 | Hobart Amory Hare, Walter Chrystie - Therapeutics - 1912 - 724 pages
...compensation, he on his part has an absolute legal right to avail himself of all the provisions thus made." 18 Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US, 405, 1908; see abstract in GH Montague, The Sherman Anti-Trust Act and the Patent Law, YALE LAW JOURNAL,... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - Antitrust law - 1912 - 958 pages
...patent. That is supported by Bloomer v. McQuewan (14 How., 539, 548; opinion by Taney, CÏu'ef Justice); Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. (210 US, 405, 425; opinion by Justice McKenna); Blount v. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. (166 Fed., 555 opinion rendered... | |
 | Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1913 - 758 pages
...conditions, and he may prevent all others from infringing in any way upon the rights thus secured to him. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co. 210 US 405. But he is given no immunity from general laws governing the rest of the community and not directly... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Law reports, digests, etc - 1913 - 758 pages
...exercising like privileges without the consent of the patentee. Bloomer v. McQuewan, 14 How. 539, 549; Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405, 425. It was passed for the purpose of encouraging useful invention and promoting new and useful improvements... | |
 | Appellate courts - 1914 - 784 pages
...primary, it is substantial and important, and is therefore entitled to a fair range of equivalent*. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 U. S. 405, 28 Sup. Ct. 748, 52 L. Ed. 1122. [5] Defendants appear to attach great importance to the phrase "end to end," as... | |
 | Walter Forwood Rogers - Patent laws and legislation - 1914 - 902 pages
...rules of interpretation now apply is evidenced for example, in the decision of the Supreme Court in Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405, 51 L. ed. 922, in which the court quotes from Section 485, Robinson on Patents, as follows : "The principle... | |
 | Harold Edgar Barnes - Constitutional law - 1915 - 376 pages
...the use of them is of the very essence of the right conferred by the patents, Paper Bag Patent Case (Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.,) 210 US 405, and it may be assumed that the success of the several groups was due to their patents having been the... | |
 | Lewis Henry Haney - Business enterprises - 1916 - 556 pages
...of restraining trade (Beaton Peninsular Button Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co., 77 Fed. 288 ; Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., 210 US 405). But the patentee cannot suppress for the purpose of restraining trade. Thus, in the Blount Mfg. Co.... | |
| |
Continental Paper Bag Co. v Eastern Paper Bag Co. 210 US 405, 52 L Ed 1122, 28 S Ct 748 (1908) ; Crown Die & Tool Co. 
