Harvard Law Review, Volume 41Harvard Law Review Pub. Association, 1928 - Electronic journals |
Contents
| xiii | |
| xxi | |
| xxii | |
| xxviii | |
| xxix | |
| xxxi | |
| xxxix | |
| xliii | |
| xlvii | |
| 29 | |
| 51 | |
| 91 | |
| 97 | |
| 113 | |
| 117 | |
| 272 | |
| 281 | |
| 283 | |
| 336 | |
| 390 | |
| 418 | |
| 421 | |
| 453 | |
| 483 | |
| 511 | |
| 662 | |
| 674 | |
| 681 | |
| 685 | |
| 709 | |
| 740 | |
| 780 | |
| 784 | |
| 816 | |
| 818 | |
| 860 | |
| 906 | |
| 943 | |
| 1068 | |
| 1083 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action Amendment anticipatory repudiation appeal applied authority Bank breach claim clause Comm Commission common carrier common law conflict of laws Congress constitutional contract corporation court of equity creditor criminal damages decision defendant defendant's denied dissent diversity jurisdiction doctrine droit duty eminent domain employee enforce equity ex rel fact federal courts foreign Fourteenth Amendment fraud HARV Harvard Law School held Holmes ibid injunction interest interstate commerce Interstate Commerce Commission involved judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury Justice legislation liability limited Mass matter ment Minn N. Y. Supp negligent Ohio opinion parties person plaintiff present principle probate problem promise protection question railroad railway rate base reason regulation remedy result rule seems Star Chamber STAT statute suit supra note Supreme Court surety testator theory tion tort trial trust Union United valuation YALE L. J. York
Popular passages
Page 151 - We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the state for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetents.
Page 203 - ... intended, by any person interested therein, to be received, possessed, sold, or in any manner used, either in the original package or otherwise, in violation of any law of such State, Territory, or District of the United States, or place noncontiguous to but subject to the jurisdiction thereof, is hereby prohibited.
Page 142 - This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. But I do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that...
Page 284 - And in this there is no inconsistency, for while the meaning of constitutional guaranties never varies, the scope of their application must expand or contract to meet the new and different conditions which are constantly coming within the field of their operation. In a changing world, it is impossible that it should be otherwise.
Page 134 - I do not think the United States would come to an end if we lost our power to declare an Act of Congress void. I do think the Union would be imperiled if we could not make that declaration as to the laws of the several States.
Page 142 - It is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States.
Page 403 - ... and declares only that the powers "not delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the States, are reserved to the States or to the people.
Page 73 - Territory to which such person has fled, and produces a copy of an indictment found, or an affidavit made before a magistrate of any State or Territory, charging the person demanded with having committed treason, felony, or other crime...
Page 492 - States which declares that the "judicial power shall extend . . . to controversies . . . between citizens of different States...
Page 137 - Persecution for the expression of opinions seems to me perfectly logical. If you have no doubt of your premises or your power and want a certain result with all your heart you naturally express your wishes in law and sweep away all opposition.