Under the doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control. American Jewish Year Book - Page 446edited by - 1926Full view - About this book
| United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - Courts - 1976 - 1102 pages
...Sisters, 268 US 510, 534-535 (1925), the protection held to have been unconstitutionally abridged was "the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the...upbringing and education of children under their control" (emphasis added) . See also Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 US 205, 232-233 (1972). Indeed, Village of Belle... | |
| Electronic journals - 1926 - 688 pages
...the act in effect sought to abolish all elementary, private schools. The court held that the law " unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents...upbringing and education of children under their control," and deprives private schools of " business and property for which they claim protection." This c'se... | |
| Evolution - 1925 - 356 pages
...to the public welfare. "Under the doctrine of Meyer vs. Nebraska, 262 U S., Page 390, we think it is entirely plain that the act of 1922 unreasonably interferes...their control. As often heretofore pointed out, rights granted by the constitution may not be breached by legislation, which has no reasonable relation to... | |
| Electronic journals - 1926 - 1176 pages
...Jesus and Mary,"9 involving the Oregon Private-School Law, it said, again through Judge McReynolds: " We think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably...upbringing and education of children under their control. . . . The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any... | |
| Albert Bushnell Hart - Almanacs, American - 1926 - 1214 pages
...held void as applicable to private schools a law prohibiting the teaching of German. The Oregon act "unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents...upbringing and education of children under their control," and deprives private schools without due process of law of "business and property for which they claim... | |
| Education - 1926 - 862 pages
...liberty, or property without due process of law." In the opinion of the court, the challenged legislation "unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents...upbringing and education of children under their control The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1926 - 810 pages
...doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska^ 262 US 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 un/ reasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and ^ guardians to direct the upbringing and education of chil510 Opinion of the Court. dren under their control. As often heretofore pointed out, rights guaranteed... | |
| Ellwood Patterson Cubberley - Education - 1927 - 822 pages
...United States Supreme Court, which in 1925 declared the law unconstitutional on the ground that it " interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians...upbringing and education of children under their control." Continuing, the Court further held: As often heretofore pointed out, rights guaranteed by the constitution... | |
| John Frederick Bender - Education, Compulsory - 1927 - 204 pages
...measures relative to primary education. It was entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interfered with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct...upbringing and education of children under their control. Rights guaranteed by the constitution might not be abridged by legislation which had no reasonable... | |
| Columbia University. Teachers College - Education - 1927 - 204 pages
...measures relative to primary education. It was entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interfered with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct...upbringing and education of children under their control. Rights guaranteed by the constitution might not be abridged by legislation which had no reasonable... | |
| |