...maximum working hours, the US Supreme Court held such legislation to be unconstitutional and stated: Statutes of the nature of that under review limiting...mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual.19 In short, we see that the attempts of the legislatures to find some sort of regulation...

...that or of any other trade as a remedy for ill health." Statutes "of the nature of that under review are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights...from condemnation by the claim that they are passed . . . upon the subject of the health of the individual whose rights are interfered with." Work in any...

...it better had it been candid enough to quote Lochner: 'Statutes of the nature of that under review are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights...from condemnation by the claim that they are passed . . . upon the subject of the health of the individual whose rights are interfered with'." " By Lochner,...

...that or of any other trade as a remedv for ill health." Statute* "of the nature of that under review are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights...individual. and they are not saved from condemnation bv the claim that they are poaed . . . upon the subject of the health of the individual whose rights...

...New York statute limiting employment in bakeries to ten hours a day, stating that statutes limning the hours in which "grown and intelligent men may...meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual "27 For the next thirty years the Court used the due process clause to invalidate minimum wage laws,...

...human race. 19 Only two years before, the Court had ruled in Lochner v. New York that "[limits on] the hours in which grown and intelligent men may labor...living, are mere meddlesome interferences with the right of the individual."20 Following Muller v. Oregon, states rapidly passed protective laws, beginning...

...determined that the New York law was not a valid exercise of such powers. Rather, statutes that limit "the hours in which grown and intelligent men may...interferences with the rights of the individual." 17 Conveniently ignoring the reality that workers participate in the labor market with considerably...

...one to the degree which would authorize the legislature to interfere with the right to labor. . . . Statutes of the nature of that under review, limiting...interferences with the rights of the individual." The "Lochner decision," explained labor historian Elizabeth Brandeis, "was of the greatest significance...

...New York that hours could not be limited for bakers. According to the majority opinion in that case, "Statutes of the nature of that under review, limiting...mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual."199 But the Supreme Court took a very different view in its unanimous 19o8 ruling in favor...

...which he had condemned in his Budd opinion. "Statutes of the nature of that under review," he declared, "limiting the hours in which grown and intelligent...mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual."3s Unfortunately, "This interference on the part of the legislatures of the several States...