...constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory"32 and that the "accident" of the Court "finding certain opinions natural and familiar or...them conflict with the Constitution of the United States " 33 seemed at last to have been heeded, in the regard which was paid in Midler v. Oregon to...

...dissent in Lochner: "[T]he fact that [such] moral judgment . . . may be 'natural and familiar . . . ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question...them conflict with the Constitution of the United States.'" Id. at 199 (Blackmun, J., dissenting) (quoting Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45, 76 [1905]...

...relation of the citizen to the state or of laissez-faire. It is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions...and familiar, or novel and even shocking, ought not conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution...

...particular economic theory.... It is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or...novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgement upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United...

...be because of fortuities of our lives and circumstances. Hence Holmes's remarkable suggestion that the "accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar or novel and even shocking" is beside the constitutional point. Holmes meant exactly what he said. With few exceptions, he believed...

...relation of the citizen to the State or of laissez faire. It is made for people of fundamentally differing stances as to preclude the giving of effective aid...adverted to, "that there are certain immutable principles States. General propositions do not decide concrete cases. The decision will depend on a judgment or...

...relation of the citizen to the state or of laissez faire. It is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions...them conflict with the Constitution of the United States" (149). Holmes was striking out at the idea that a judge's underlying assumptions often are...

...signature case of the laissez-faire era: "[The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions...them conflict with the Constitution of the United States."38 The justice also did his best to accommodate the recommendations and feelings of his colleagues...

...relation of the citizen to the State or of laissez faire. It is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions...them conflict with the Constitution of the United States. General propositions do not decide concrete cases. The der cision will depend on a judgment...