Hidden fields
Books Books
" This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. But I do not conceive that... "
The Law Quarterly Review - Page 212
edited by - 1905
Full view - About this book

Congress Confronts the Court: The Struggle for Legitimacy and Authority in ...

Colton C. Campbell, John F. Stack - Law - 2001 - 344 pages
...reliance on cooperative federalism, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes denounced the activism of the Court: This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. . . . The Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics. ... It is settled...
Limited preview - About this book

The Constitution and the New Deal

G. Edward White - History - 2002 - 408 pages
...judicial hymn to laissez-faire ideology. The other opinion, a dissent by Holmes that announced that "[t]his case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain," and suggested that "the Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics,"'...
Limited preview - About this book

Fundamental Rights: History of a Constitutional Doctrine

Milton Ridvas Konvitz - Law - 2001 - 204 pages
...opinion of Justice Holmes is one of the most famous of American judicial opinions. The case, he said, was decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. . . . The Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics. ... I think lhal...
Limited preview - About this book

The Justices, Judging, and Judicial Reputation

Kermit L. Hall - Biography & Autobiography - 2000 - 396 pages
...Black "heard from the people," one might recall Holmes's comment in Lochner that the case had been decided "upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain."139 One might also note Brandeis' famous talk on "the living law" and his charge that courts...
Limited preview - About this book

Brandeis and the Progressive Constitution: Erie, the Judicial Power, and the ...

Edward A. Purcell - Law - 2000 - 446 pages
...Court's archetypal anti-Progressive decision, Lochner v. New York. "This case is decided," he charged, "upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain." l7 Given his positivism, his attack on Swift, and his rejection of substantive due process, Holmes...
Limited preview - About this book

Historic U.S. Court Cases: An Encyclopedia, Volume 1

John W. Johnson - Law - 2001 - 608 pages
...majorities." Justice Holmes dissented from the Peckham opinion with some of his best known rhetoric: "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. . . . The Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics. ... I think that...
Limited preview - About this book

The Lost World of Classical Legal Thought: Law and Ideology in America, 1886 ...

William M. Wiecek - History - 2001 - 300 pages
...elite. The most influential imputation of this idea was Justice Oliver Wendell Holmess Lochner dissent: "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a larg'e part of the country does not entertain. . . . The 14th Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencers Social Statics."12 Holmess assertion was...
Limited preview - About this book

Only One Place of Redress: African Americans, Labor Regulations, and the ...

David E. Bernstein - Law - 2001 - 242 pages
...Lochner, 198 US at 75 (Holmes, J. dissenting) (criticizing Lochner majority for deciding the case based "upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain"); Raoul Berger, Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment 249-82 (1977);...
Limited preview - About this book

Between Competition and Free Movement: The Economic Constitutional Law of ...

Julio Baquero Cruz - Law - 2002 - 205 pages
...contractual liberty enshrined in the substantive interpretation of the due process clause. Holmes dissented: This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. [. . .] [A] Constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism...
Limited preview - About this book

The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

Jeffrey A. Segal, Harold J. Spaeth - Law - 2002 - 484 pages
...regulations, the Court ruled that only the states could do so. Justice Holmes argued in dissent that this case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. . . . The Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics. ... A constitution...
Limited preview - About this book




  1. My library
  2. Help
  3. Advanced Book Search
  4. Download EPUB
  5. Download PDF