 This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. But I do not conceive that...  The Outlook - Page 5691911Full view - About this book
 | A. H. Armstrong - Philosophy - 1967 - 1054 pages
...Spencer's Social Statics'. A majority of the people, Holmes adds, had rejected laissez-faire economics, and 'my agreement or disagreement has nothing to do with...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law' (Holmes 1905 [1992: 306]). Roscoe Pound's early work was in some respects comparable. Extraordinarily... | |
 | Lorenzo D'Avack, Francesco Riccobono - Law - 2004 - 208 pages
...theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law". "But a Constitution - prosegue il Justice Holmes - is not intended to embody a particular economic... | |
 | David L. Faigman - History - 2004 - 440 pages
...theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. . . . The Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics.49 Just as... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - Actions and defenses - 2004 - 236 pages
...agreed with that theory. I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind liut I do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly...believe that my agreement or disagreement has nothing lo do with die right of ilr majority lo embody tlieir opinions in law. Id. at 75 (emphasis added).... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - Actions and defenses - 2004 - 238 pages
...theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. Hut I do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement... | |
 | Glyn Morgan - EU - 2005 - 228 pages
...Court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes put forward the following famous statement of judicial restraint: I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. It is settled by various decisions of this court that state constitutions and state laws may regulate... | |
 | Sophie Littlefield, William Wiecek - Juvenile Nonfiction - 2004 - 112 pages
...is good public policy or not. "I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement [with the law] has nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law," he wrote. Whereas Peckham considered the case on the basis of whether the law was, in his words,... | |
 | Ann Scales - Law - 2006 - 230 pages
...theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. . . . [A] Constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism... | |
 | Frederic R. Kellogg - Philosophy - 2006
...theory which a large part of the country does not entertain." If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law.31 Following this came the same point which he had made in Otis, that a policy of permitting state... | |
| |
