This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. But I do not conceive that... The Outlook - Page 5771911Full view - About this book
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - Law - 2004 - 238 pages
...theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. Hut I do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - Law - 2004 - 228 pages
...part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, 1 should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. iStit I do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement... | |
| Glyn Morgan - EU - 2005 - 228 pages
...Court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes put forward the following famous statement of judicial restraint: I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. It is settled by various decisions of this court that state constitutions and state laws may regulate... | |
| Sophie Littlefield, William Wiecek - Juvenile Nonfiction - 2004 - 112 pages
...is good public policy or not. "I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement [with the law] has nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law," he wrote. Whereas Peckham considered the case on the basis of whether the law was, in his words,... | |
| Ann Scales - Law - 2006 - 230 pages
...theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. . . . [A] Constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism... | |
| Frederic R. Kellogg - Philosophy - 2006
...theory which a large part of the country does not entertain." If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law.31 Following this came the same point which he had made in Otis, that a policy of permitting state... | |
| G. Edward White - Biography & Autobiography - 2006 - 173 pages
...theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study it further...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law . . . The other day we sustained the Massachusetts vaccination law. United States and state statutes... | |
| Brian Z. Tamanaha - Law - 2006 - 238 pages
...the judges were an improper basis for a constitutional decision. "I strongly believe," Holmes wrote, "that my agreement or disagreement has nothing to...the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law."45 When called upon to make decisions that turn on policy, Holmes felt that the duty of judges... | |
| Elisabeth Israels Perry, Karen Manners Smith - Juvenile Nonfiction - 2006 - 433 pages
...say whether he agreed with a law that limited the working hours of bakers, Holmes asserted that his "agreement or disagreement has nothing to do with the right of a majority [of the legislature of the state of New York] to embody their opinions in law," and that "State constitutions... | |
| |