Under the doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control. Law and Labor - Page 1481925Full view - About this book
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - Computers - 1996 - 208 pages
...510, 534-35 (1925) (striking state law requiring children to attend public schools as "interferftng] with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct...the upbringing and education of children under their contron; Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, 401 (1923) (striking state law prohibiting the teaching of... | |
| John Thomas Scopes - Law - 1997 - 356 pages
...doctrine of Meyer vs. Nebraska, 262 U S., Page 390, we think it is entirely plain that the act of 1022 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents...their control. As often heretofore pointed out, rights granted by the constitution may not be breached by legislation, which has no reasonable relation to... | |
| Carl Wellman - Law - 1997 - 292 pages
...Oregon Act which forbade parents from sending their children to private schools because such an act 'unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents...upbringing and education of children under their control'. 268 US at534-535. As this Court said in Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 US 158, at 166, the Meyer and... | |
| Ruthann Robson - Education - 1998 - 506 pages
...to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men." 6 The Court in Pierce relied upon Meyer to posit "the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the...upbringing and education of children under their control," stating with a rhetorical flourish that the "child is not the mere creature of the State; those who... | |
| James W. Fraser - Education - 2000 - 296 pages
...property rights to include the right "to the orderly pursuit of happiness." McReynolds thus insisted: [W]e think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922...upbringing and education of children under their control. . . . The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any... | |
| Madeleine Mercedes Plasencia - Law - 1999 - 392 pages
...Oregon Act which forbade parents from sending their children to private schools because such an act "unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents...upbringing and education of children under their control." 268 US, at 534-535. As this Court said in Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 US 158, at 166, the Meyer and... | |
| Thomas C. Hunt, Thomas Oldenski, Theodore Joseph Wallace - Catholic schools - 2000 - 306 pages
...that Oregon's compulsory attendance law was unconstitutional because it "unreasonably interfere[d] with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct...upbringing and education of children under their control" (pp. 534-35). Along with upholding the right of Catholic schools to operate, Pierce established a key... | |
| |