| Lenora Ledwon - Law and literature - 1996 - 522 pages
...then is the source of their power? The first paragraph of the dissent in Lochner begins: "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain."44 The proposition is not elaborated. We are told neither what the economic theory is, nor... | |
| Bernard Schwartz - Law - 1997 - 303 pages
...propositions than on concrete rules or precedents. Indeed, Holmes began with a broad proposition: "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain." Holmes neither explained nor elaborated the charge. Instead, he went on to point out that the decision... | |
| David H. Rosenbloom, Rosemary O'Leary, Joshua Chanin - Law - 1996 - 372 pages
...individual (Lochnerv. New York, 1905:57-61). A dissenting Justice Holmes described the case as being "decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain" (Lochner v. New York, 1905:75). He derided the Court's majority for failing to accept the premise that... | |
| Free enterprise - 1997 - 446 pages
...impart apparent justification to Justice Holmes's famous complaint that decisions protecting them were 'decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain'.46 But it was a concept of rights implicit in classical economics and not a total inhibition... | |
| Industrial laws and legislation - 1997 - 452 pages
...that deserve to become classical : "This case is decided opon an economic theory which a large pan of the country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreec with that theory, I should desire to study it further and lone before making up my mind. But... | |
| William M. Wiecek - Law - 1998 - 296 pages
...influential imputation of this idea was Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's Lochner dissent: "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. . . . The 14th Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencers Social Statics." 12 Holmes's assertion... | |
| David Henry Burton - Biography & Autobiography - 1998 - 186 pages
...Holmes wrote a separate, dissenting judgment that centered on five specific points: (1) the case was decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country did not entertain; (2) it is settled that state laws may regulate life in many ways which legislators... | |
| 1998 - 394 pages
...principles, he wrote; instead, it was a mask behind which courts legislated policy on the basis of "an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain."124 Holmes insisted that it was the job of legislatures, not courts, to "embody their opinions... | |
| Paul W. Kahn - Law - 1999 - 184 pages
...379 US 294 (1964). 92. Justice Holmes again gives us a classic expression of this view: "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part...that theory, I should desire to study it further. . . . But I do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement... | |
| Richard Allen Epstein - Economic liberties (U.S. Constitution) - 2000 - 430 pages
...majority is put hy Mr. Justice Holmes in a few sentences that deserve to hecome classical : "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part...theory, I should desire to study it further and long hefore making up my mind. But I do not conceive that to he my duty hecause I strongly helieve that... | |
| |