Was it possible to lose the Nation and yet preserve the Constitution ? By general law, life and limb must be protected ; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life ; but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures otherwise... Readings in American Government and Politics - Page 69by Charles Austin Beard - 1909 - 624 pagesFull view - About this book
 | Phillip G. Henderson - Biography & Autobiography - 2000 - 324 pages
...be that one institution is the more legitimate holder of the people's will and power: "often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to save a limb."43 It was his belief that the oath he took to protect the Constitution, as he put it, "imposed... | |
 | Stig Förster, Jorg Nagler - History - 2002 - 724 pages
...have seemed to legitimize a dictatorship analogous to that of Bismarck from 1862-1866." Ibid., 57. "that measures otherwise unconstitutional might become...of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation."36 The wars that Lincoln and Bismarck waged in behalf of national unity shared more than a... | |
 | Clinton Rossiter - 346 pages
...all three of these foundations of constitutional democracy. When Abraham Lincoln said: "Often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb,"* he was grounding a number of unconstitutional and dictatorial actions on the law of necessity. The... | |
 | Charles M. Hubbard - Biography & Autobiography - 2003 - 270 pages
...should be suspended or at least temporarily modified. He pointed out on another occasion that these "measures otherwise unconstitutional might become...of the constitution through the preservation of the Union."5 Clearly Lincoln saw the war powers in the presidency as expanding the role of the executive... | |
 | Roger Milton Barrus - History - 2004 - 178 pages
...actions during the Civil War. Lincoln defended his exercise of power by explaining that, "Often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never...Constitution, through the preservation of the nation." 5 With modest reflection it is clear that the core of Lincoln and Locke's argument is that the uncertain... | |
 | Alan Brinkley, Davis Dyer - Executive power - 2004 - 604 pages
...individual liberties, used a comparison that all Americans of this era could understand. "A limb," he said, "must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb." Widely circulated, such messages cast Lincoln as the head of a government educating the people in the... | |
 | James Walsh - Art - 2004 - 353 pages
...law," Lincoln wrote to a newspaper editor in 1864, "life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to save a limb." Lincoln's decision followed the reality of the times. Many states— especially Kansas and other western... | |
 | Charles Pierce Roland - History - 2004 - 348 pages
...sometimes be necessary in order to save the whole. He once explained this view by saying, "Often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to save a limb." Temporarily, Lincoln and a majority in Congress were agreed on a single war aim, preservation of the... | |
 | Jeffrey Manber, Neil Dahlstrom - History - 2006 - 370 pages
...and yet preserve the Constitution? By general law life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never...Right or wrong I assumed this ground, and now avow it. >>l — Abraham Lincoln, April 4, 1864 It was the hottest ticket in town. Everyone who could crammed... | |
 | Ronald J. Pestritto, Thomas G. West - History - 2005 - 318 pages
...actions at the outset ot the Civil War: By general law life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never...constitution, through the preservation of the nation. 1-v' Here, one might say, these statesmen all hearken back to the first principle of republican government,... | |
| |