...judgment that " the fourteenth amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics . . . a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory whether of paternalism or organic relation of citizen to state or of laisser-faire . . . the accident of our finding certain...

...constitution 'State rs. Mikslcek, 125 SW Rep. 507. 'People er rcl. Hoelderlln r». Kane, 79 Misc. May is not intended to embody a particular economic theory,...whether of paternalism and the organic relation of the citizens to the state or of laissez faire.' "The fact that economic theories entertained by the judges...

...where sanctioned by Congress, that elevate local concerns over interstate competition. Ante, at 876878. "But a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory .... It is made for people of fundamentally differing views." Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45, 75-76...

...still recent. Holden v. Hardy, 169 US 366. Some of these laws embody convictions or prejudices which judges are likely to share. Some may not. But a constitution...paternalism and the organic relation of the citizen of the State or of laissez faire. . . . Every opinion tends to become a law. I think that the word...

...502, 525 (1934). "The Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics. ... a constitution is not intended to embody a particular...of the citizen to the state or of laissez faire." Holmes, dissenting in Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45, 75 (1905), involving a law fixing the maximum...

...case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of this country does not entertain. ... But a Constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether paternalism and the organic relation of the citizen to the state or laissez faire." Justice Harlan...

...that foreshadowed the growth of constitutional law during and after the Great Depression, argued that "a Constitution is not intended to embody a particular...of the citizen to the state or of laissez faire." Instead, a Constitution "is made for people of fundamentally differing views." In some respects that...

...has sought to match, if not surpass, Justice Holmes's famous Lochner dissent; compare, if you will: A constitution is not intended to embody a particular...the organic relation of the citizen to the state or laissez-faire. I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement with the wisdom of [the challenged...

..."Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics." 89 Indeed, he noted that "a constitution is not intended to embody a particular...organic relation of the citizen to the State or of laissezfaire. " 90 And no matter how "injudicious" or "tyrannical" a statute may appear to be, when...

...dissent in Lochner. The Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics. ... [A] constitution is not intended to embody a particular...laissez faire. It is made for people of fundamentally different views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar or novel and...